SOSIALISASI KEPEMIMPINAN PEMUDA BUDDHIS MELALUI KONSEP DASA RAJA DHAMMA DI VIHARA DHARMA-CAKRA BUDDHIST CENTRE MEDAN SOCIALIZATION OF BUDDHIST YOUTH LEADERSHIP THROUGH THE CONCEPT OF DASA RAJA DHAMMA AT THE DHARMA-CAKRA BUDDHIST CENTER MEDAN

Main Article Content

Sunter Candra Yana
Hubert Sutio

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pelaksanaan program sosialisasi kepemimpinan bagi pemuda Buddhis melalui internalisasi nilai-nilai Dasa Raja Dhamma di Vihara DharmaCakra Buddhist Centre Medan. Latar belakang kegiatan ini muncul dari kurangnya partisipasi aktif generasi muda dalam aktivitas keagamaan dan ketiadaan sosok pemimpin muda yang mencerminkan nilai-nilai Buddhisme. Metode yang digunakan meliputi observasi awal, penyampaian materi sosialisasi, diskusi interaktif, serta evaluasi melalui pre-test dan post-test kepada 18 peserta. Hasil analisis menunjukkan adanya peningkatan rata-rata skor dari 44,00 (pre-test) menjadi 45,88 (post-test), meskipun secara statistik tidak signifikan (p = 0,347). Ini menunjukkan bahwa intervensi awal melalui sosialisasi memberikan dampak positif secara praktis terhadap pemahaman peserta, meskipun belum cukup kuat secara statistik. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya pendekatan sistematis dalam pembinaan kepemimpinan berbasis nilai spiritual untuk memperkuat regenerasi kepemimpinan Buddhis yang berkarakter dan relevan. Program ini memberikan kontribusi strategis dalam memperkuat kapasitas internal komunitas vihara dan dapat diterapkan di komunitas Buddhis lainnya di Indonesia dan Asia Tenggara.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Arshad, M. M., Ismail, I. A., Ahmad Fesol, S. F., & Ismail, A. (2021). Character Development and Youth Leadership Mentoring. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 29(S1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s1.03

Bach, P. X. (2014). Mindful Leadership: A Phenomenological Study of Vietnamese Buddhist Monks in America withRespect to their Spiritual Leadership Roles and Contributions to Society. [Drexel University]. https://doi.org/10.17918/etd-4433

Christens, B. D., & Dolan, T. (2011). Interweaving Youth Development, Community Development, and Social Change Through Youth Organizing. Youth & Society, 43(2), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10383647

Hastings, L. J., Barrett, L. A., Barbuto, Jr., & Bell, L. C. (2011). Developing a Paradigm Model of Youth Leadership Development and Community Engagement: A Grounded Theory. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01019

Marjuni, H. A. (2022). KONSEP KEPEMIMPINAN PENDIDIKAN DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN PRINSIP PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 11(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.24252/ip.v11i1.30087

Chanasapo, P. S., Klomkul, L., Phrakruwirojkanchanakhet, & PhramahaBoonrodMahaweero. (2021). Development of Spiritual Leadership in Educational Institutions Integrated with Buddhism. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 58(1), 3714–3718. www.psychologyandeducation.net

Rodriguez, S. (2019). “We’re building the community; it’s a hub for democracy.”: Lessons learned from a library-based, school-district partnership and program to increase belonging for newcomer immigrant and refugee youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.04.025

Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2016). Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1113879

TEPUS, A.-M. (2018). The Relationship between the Capital Market and the Real Economy: The Case of the European Union. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v8-i2/4241

Thanissaro, P. N. (2018). Beyond Precepts in Conceptualizing Buddhist Leadership. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 25, 120–145. https://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/2018/03/23/buddhist-leadership/

Yasmin, M., Naseem, F., & Masso, I. C. (2019). Teacher-directed learning to self-directed learning transition barriers in Pakistan. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.02.003